
A Project Report.
Joint refining of workflows and development of a guideline as a binding basis for consistent technical documentation.
Presentations of two systems, reference visit for a realistic assessment of the effort involved and decision by the entire tech writing team to ensure broad acceptance.
Support during partial migration and ongoing content creation, as well as on-site coaching and support during and after implementation.

Before introducing the component content management system, SUSS MicroTec worked with Adobe FrameMaker 10 without XML and wrote directly in English as non-native speakers. Creating technical documentation directly in English was a major challenge for the technical writers, which is why the authoring language has since been changed to German.
In principle, the technical writers worked in parallel, resulting in many copies of documents and redundant texts. Overall, this led to a low reuse rate, very high translation costs and time-consuming change management, for example when liability-related content had to be amended.
SUSS MicroTec wanted to reduce translation costs and organise their technical documentation more efficiently. A content management system should store information modules centrally and only once, enable their reuse and support rapid publication in line with standards and guidelines. Personal filing systems were to be replaced by a structured central database. The decision required patience: For four years, SUSS MicroTec convinced the company management with figures, facts and a realistic ROI calculation. In addition, the implementation required support to run alongside day-to-day operations.
One key objective was to significantly reduce the high translation costs. Because information modules in the component content management system exist only once and do not have to be maintained in countless variants, translations can also be managed more efficiently and duplicate effort can be avoided.
The previous way of working was characterised by parallel work, copied documents and redundant texts. A major challenge, therefore, was to structure content in such a way that it could be reused multiple times and the reuse rate could be increased significantly.
In addition to modularising the content, the project aimed to replace personal filing systems on individual drives. What was needed was a solution in which the valid version of an information module could be found quickly and documents could be published in line with standards and guidelines.
Last but not least, the project was also organisationally demanding. The introduction had to be justified internally over a number of years – with figures, data, facts and a realistic ROI calculation. At the same time, the decision could not be made by one person alone; it needed the support of the entire team and had to be implemented alongside day-to-day operations.

The collaboration began with a documentation check and workshops on process optimisation, which led to the creation of the editorial guidelines. SUSS MicroTec evaluated two content management systems. In addition to functionality, coaching and support were key factors. A reference visit to Dürr provided a practical insight into the future way of working. The technical writing team made the decision collectively. The management then approved support for partial migration and on-the-job training. kothes provided support for implementation, technical writing and coaching – all from a single source.


"It is a trusting relationship: I can always call kothes with any problem without hesitation, and I always receive help. The Technical Editors who support us are competent and friendly. I can only say positive things about them."
Sandra Remmler
Technical Editor
SUSS
We will get back to you as soon as possible.

